INTRODUCTION
Today, I will talk about the case of Esteem
Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. Chetan Kamble & Others, 2022 SCC OnLine SC
246, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court discussed the concept and the importance
of Public Interest Litigations (PILs) in India.
MEANING
Basically, Public Interest Litigation is an effort
to provide legal representation to groups and interests that have been unrepresented
or under-represented in the legal process. It is different from traditional or
adversarial litigation that acts simply as a means of settling disputes between
different parties, mostly private in nature.
Most of the High Courts and the Supreme Court have
devised their own procedure of dealing with Public Interest Litigations. These
Public Interest Litigations are generally dealt with under Article 32 and Article
136 of the Constitution of India by the Supreme Court and under Article 226 of
the Constitution by the High Courts. It is also pertinent to note that Public Interest
Litigations cannot be filed before the District Courts or other lower courts
since they are not vested with such extraordinary jurisdiction that enables
them to deal with causes of public importance.
LOCUS STANDI
Another special feature of a Public Interest Litigation
is that anybody could file it before the Court and the concept of locus
standi stands slightly diluted in the case of PILs. It is not required that
only the person affected needs to file a Public Interest Litigation. A
different person who has the knowledge of the cause of action and is public
spirited, can also file Public Interest Litigations on behalf of disadvantaged
or interest groups. Normally, PILs have had a beneficial effect on the Indian
jurisprudence and has alleviated the conditions of the citizens in general.
IMPORTANT POINTS TO REMEMBER
In the case at hand, the Hon’ble Court discussed
the following directions that are important to be followed while deciding
Public Interest Litigations: -
a. Genuine and bona fide PILs must be encouraged
and PILs filed with ulterior or frivolous motives must be discouraged by
imposing costs.
b. All the High Courts must have their own
respective procedure to deal with the PILs.
c. Credentials of the person filing the PIL must
be verified by the Court.
d. The pleadings made in the PIL must be correct
and true involving substantial or larger public interest.
e. There should be no personal gain or private or
oblique motive behind filing a PIL.
f. When an issue involved in a PIL requires grave
and urgent attention, it must be given priority over other Petitions. And
g. Private disputes must not be raised, or personal
scores must not be settled, in the garb of a Public Interest Litigation.
Thus, I hope that the basic concept and nature of the
Public Interest Litigations in India is clear by now.
No comments:
Post a Comment