INTRODUCTION
Today, I will talk about the case of Babu
Venkatesh and Others v. State of Karnataka and Another, 2022 SCC OnLine
SC 200, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court discussed the manner in which an
Application, or Criminal Complaint under S. 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) is to be preferred before a Magistrate.
WHAT IS 156 (3) OF CRPC?
In order to know about filing of a Criminal Complaint
before a Magistrate, it is important to understand that S. 156 (3) read with S.
190 of CrPC provides that any magistrate may take cognizance of an offence and
order an investigation: -
a. Upon receiving a complaint of facts which
constitute such offence; or
b. Upon a police report of such facts; or
c. Upon information received from any person or
upon his own knowledge that such offence has been committed.
Thus, we see that wide powers have been granted
under CrPC to Magistrates to look into the criminal complaints. It is pertinent
to note that a person cannot directly prefer a Criminal Complaint/Application
before a Magistrate. There are other remedies that ought to be exercised before
approaching a Magistrate under S. 156 (3).
PRIOR IMPORTANT REMEDIES
Firstly, the Informant or the Applicant must
approach the concerned Police Station seeking filing of the FIR (First
Information Report) in relation to the commission of a cognizable offence under
S. 154 (1) and if there is refusal on part of the concerned Police Officer or
Police Station to register such an FIR, he ought to disclose such information
to the concerned Superintendent of Police (SP) under S. 154 (3) who if satisfied
may direct an investigation in relation to commission of such cognizable
offence. It is when these remedies get exhausted, a person may approach the
Magistrate seeking invocation of powers under S. 156 (3) of CrPC.
IMPORTANT POINTS TO REMEMBER
In the present case, the Court discussed the
following modalities that ought to be complied with while dealing with and
deciding a Complaint under S. 156 (3) of CrPC: -
a. Applications under S. 156 (3) of CrPC must be
supported by an Affidavit duly sworn by the Applicant who seeks to invoke the
jurisdiction of the Magistrate.
b. Such Magistrate ought to verify the truth and
veracity of the allegations made in the Complaint/Application before him.
c. The Magistrate
must be satisfied that the Application under S. 156 (3) must not be made in a
routine or casual manner with an intent to settle personal scores.
d. Mentioning of prior Applications under S. 154
(1) and S. 154 (3) must be spelt out clearly in the Application under S. 156
(3) before the Magistrate.
e. The Magistrate must see that there is no undue delay
or laches in filing of the Application under S. 156 (3). And
f. The Application under S. 156 (3) must not be
filed merely to harass other persons or to abuse the process of law.
Thus, the above-stated points must be kept into
mind while preferring an Application, or Criminal Complaint under S. 156 (3) of
CrPC before a Magistrate.
No comments:
Post a Comment