INTRODUCTION
Today, I will talk about the case of Union
of India & Anr. v. Shaikh Istiyaq Ahmed & Ors., Criminal Appeal
No. 71 of 2022, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court discussed the Repatriation of
Prisoners Act, 2003, that deals with the detention of foreign prisoners in
India and the Indian prisoners detained in foreign countries.
In this regard, the country that convicts the
prisoner is generally termed as the Transferring State or Contracting State and
the country seeking repatriation of the prisoner is termed as the Receiving
State.
SCHEME OF THE REPATRIATION OF PRISONERS ACT
Basically, the object of the Repatriation of
Prisoners Act, 2003, “is to provide an opportunity to the convicts to be
repatriated to their country so that they can be closer to their families and
have better chances of rehabilitation.” The Act also provides that the
enforcement of the penal sentence is to be governed by the Law of the Receiving
State, but the Receiving State shall be bound by the nature and duration of the
sentence as determined by the Transferring State.
Further, S. 12 of the Repatriation of Prisoners
Act stipulates that “the transfer of a prisoner who is a citizen of India
from a contracting State wherein he is undergoing sentence of imprisonment may
be accepted by the Central Government, subject to certain conditions.”
According to the Court, “the Section enables the Government to issue a
warrant to detain the prisoner…. if the Government decides to accept the
transfer of a Prisoner.” In this regard, India has also entered
into various agreements with different countries in relation to repatriation of
prisoners.
IMPORTANT PRINCIPLES LAID DOWN
In the present case, the Court was concerned with
repatriation of an Indian citizen who was convicted by the Supreme Court of
Mauritius for possession of drugs and was sentenced to imprisonment for 26
years. In this light, various principles were culled out by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India in relation to repatriation of prisoners from a foreign state to
India that are as follows: -
a. “Any request for transfer of a prisoner
from a contracting State to India shall be subject to the terms and conditions
as stated in the agreement between a contracting State and Government of
India.”
b. “The sentence imposed by the transferring
State shall be binding on the receiving State i.e., India.”
c. “On acceptance of the request for
transfer of an Indian prisoner convicted and sentenced in a contracting State,
a warrant shall be issued for detention of the prisoner in accordance with”
Section 13 of the Repatriation of Prisoners Act.
d. Such warrant shall provide for the nature and
duration of imprisonment of prisoner.
e. “The imprisonment of the transferred
prisoner shall be in accordance with the warrant.”
f. Where it seems to the Government that the
sentence imposed is incompatible with the Indian Laws, the Government may adapt
a different sentence provided for a similar offence.
g. Such adapted sentence must correspond with the
sentence imposed by the contracting state, as far as possible.
Thus, the above-stated principles are to be kept
in mind while repatriating Indian citizens from prisons of foreign states. I
hope that such principles are clear by now.
No comments:
Post a Comment