Today we will discuss the meaning of a Latin term,
prima facie, that is often used in both, legal parlance and
general parlance. It is a term of wide purport, and it is important to
understand its significance.
The term prima facie is a term of wide
amplitude, and it has acted as a potent tool for the courts to ascertain
whether a case is worth listening to or not. It is also useful in the law of
evidence wherein for specific purposes such as framing of charges or temporary
injunction, a prima facie case is required to be established.
Usually, these terms are taken for granted and
their dictionary meaning though explains what they mean, yet the dictionary
meaning is not sufficient in order to understand and ascertain the application
of terms like prima facie. Hence, there is a conscious need to look into
the various case-laws as well that elucidate the importance of these terms.
Plain Meaning of Prima Facie
Black’s Law Dictionary, Eighth Edition
(2004), defines prima facie in three ways: -
1. Prima Facie (adjective) –
Sufficient to establish a fact or a raise a presumption unless disproved or
rebutted.
2. Prima facie (adverb) – At first
sight; on first appearance but subject to further evidence or information.
3. Prima facie case – The
establishment of a legally required rebuttable presumption; a party’s
production of enough evidence to allow the fact-trier to infer the fact at
issue and rule in the party’s favour.
Now let us understand the meaning of prima
facie and prima facie case as has been discussed by the
Indian Courts.
Indian Courts on Prima Facie and Prima
Facie Case
1. Pranballav Saha v. Smt. Tulsibala Dassi,
AIR 1958 Calcutta 713 – In this case, ejectment from suit-property was sought
on the ground of using it for immoral purposes. It was observed by the Court
that: -
“The question then is what a prima facie
case is. All the evidence of reputation from family physician, executors,
trustees, local residents is there. It is surely prima facie evidence.
The distinct charge in the evidence from the witness box is (l) that the
defendant is a prostitute and carries on prostitution and (2) that she took the
house on rent to run a brothel there. That is the prima facie case. She
does not come herself nor calls any witness to deny these serious allegations
of fact. Whether the Judge should believe one witness or another or one case or
another in such a context of facts is not then a question of prima facie case.
It is then a question of the weight of evidence and its credibility. Prima
facie case is not the conclusive case, and the learned Judge mistook the one
for the other in his judgement. The very fact that the defendant neither
came to the box herself nor called any witness to contradict evidence given on
oath against her shows that these facts cannot be denied. What was prima
facie against her became conclusive proof by her failure to deny.”
2. Anil Kapoor v. Finance-cum-Health
Secretary Chandigarh Administration, 1974 Cri L J 862, Punjab and
Haryana High Court –
“According to Webster's Third International
Dictionary (1961 Edition), “prima facie case means a case established by
“prima facie evidence” which in turn means “evidence sufficient in law
to raise a presumption of fact or establish the fact in question unless
rebutted.”
3. Shankarlal v. State of M.P., 1978
MPLJ 419, High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Per Justice G.P. Singh –
“Although it is often said that plaintiff must
show a prima facie case in support of the right claimed by him in the suit
before he can be granted temporary injunction, the real thing to be seen is
only that plaintiff's claim is not frivolous or vexatious; in other words that
there is a serious question to be tried. Plaintiff is not required to make out
a clear legal title but has to satisfy the Court that he has a fair question to
raise as to the legal right claimed by him in the suit. It is not the function
of the Court at that stage to resolve disputed questions of fact or difficult
questions of law which should be left to be decided at the conclusion of the
trial.”
4. Pirtha Singh v. Laxman Singh,
1999 SCC OnLine Raj 106 – In the context of civil cases, it was observed by the
Court that: -
“It has been held that prima facie implies
the probability of the plaintiff obtaining a relief on the materials placed
before the Court at that stage.”
5. Bank of Baroda v. Appellate Tribunal for
Foreign Exchange, 2005 SCC OnLine Del 231 – In this case, it was held
that a prima facie case “refers to an arguable or triable
case.”
6. Commissioner of Income-Tax v. McDowell
and Co. Ltd., 2006 SCC OnLine Kar 796 –
“The dictionary meaning of “prima facie” is
“at first sight”; “on the first appearance”; “on the face of it”…..
What is required to be seen is a prima facie consideration for the purpose of
allowance or disallowance [of the case] depending upon the material placed on
record.
…..
We also deem it proper to say at this
juncture that prima facie case is not to be understood as a proof of obligation
by way of evidence, etc, prima facie consideration has to be prima facie or to
use the dictionary meaning “at the first sight” or “the first impression”. It
may be that impression may be varied/modified or even destroyed at the stage of
final hearing. That-final hearing approach has not to be the
approach at the first impression, namely, prima facie impression.”
Concluding Remarks
I hope that with the help of these case-laws, the
meaning and amplitude of the term prima facie is clear to everyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment