Logo of Election Commission of India |
This is a very common question.
Many a times, we get confused and decide to give dictionary meaning to this
term. However, insolvency is a technical subject and it would not be
appropriate to ascribe a general meaning to it especially in the context of our
Constitution. Let us try to understand the meaning of ‘undischarged insolvent’
in the Constitution of India.
Under Section 2(8) of the Sale of
Goods Act, an insolvent is defined as a person who had ceased to pay his debts in the ordinary course of business,
or cannot pay his debts as they become due, whether he has committed an act of
insolvency or not.
Suffice it to say that, the
general meaning of the word insolvent is that he is a person who is unable to
pay his debts as and when they become due or whose assets are not sufficient to
meet his obligations as and when they arise.
Now, let us see the provisions of
our Constitution that have used this term.
Article 102 (1) (c) - A person
shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either
House of Parliament if he is an undischarged insolvent.
Article 191 (1) (c) - A person
shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of the
Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State if he is an undischarged
insolvent.
Article 317 (3) (a) - Notwithstanding
anything in clause (1), the President may by order remove from office the
Chairman or any other member of a Public Service Commission if the Chairman or
such other member is adjudged an insolvent.
Under the Sale of Goods Act, the question
of insolvency of a buyer is of considerable importance in the context of the seller’s
lien [Seller's Lien means the Legal right of a seller to retain title and
possession of goods sold, until their price is paid in full]. It is in this
special context a meaning is given to the expression ‘insolvent’(under the Sale of Goods Act) even though a
person had not been adjudged an insolvent in the Insolvency Act to be insolvent. That definition cannot be imported
into the Representation of People Act. The definition given in the Sale of Goods Act is merely
declaratory in character. It does not differentiate between a discharged
insolvent and an undischarged insolvent.
In the case of Thampanoor
Ravi v. Charupara Ravi & Ors., the court said that the term used
under article 102 and article 191 is ‘undischarged insolvent’ and not merely ‘insolvent’.
We have the Provincial Insolvency Act of 1920. This act does not define the
term ‘insolvent’. However, it does explain when a person could be adjudged as
an ‘insolvent’. Once a person has been adjudged as an ‘insolvent’, under Section
41 of the Insolvency Act, it is provided that a debtor may apply to the court
for an order of discharge and the court may grant or refuse such discharge.
Also, under Section 73 of
the Insolvency Act, an order of insolvency has been considered as a disqualification
to hold certain elective offices. Thus, the Insolvency Act is a complete code
and determination of all questions regarding insolvency including a question as
to whether:
(1) A person is an insolvent or
not, or
(2) An insolvent be discharged or
not and subject to what conditions, can be decided by the court constituted
under that Act alone.
Article 191 and Article 102 do not contemplate mere impecuniosity
or incapacity of a person to repay ones debts but he should not only be
adjudged insolvent but also remain undischarged. Such a contingency could only
arise under insolvency law. If the expression ‘undischarged insolvent’ has
acquired a special meaning under the law of insolvency, we must understand that
that is the meaning that is sought to be attributed to the expression used in
our Constitution. Hence, when the Legislature has used the expression
undischarged insolvent that expression must be given its full meaning.
well explained
ReplyDeletethank you
can any notification publish by election commision in regard undischarged insolvent plz provide me it is very urgent
ReplyDelete