Pages

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

S. Rajaseekaran Versus Union of India & Others - A PIL on Road Safety Regulations

Traffic Collision

Recently, a writ petition (Judgment) was filed seeking the Court’s intervention, primarily, in the matter of enforcement of the prevailing laws relating to Road Safety and also seeking directions for enactment of appropriate legislative measures and for more affirmative administrative action.

The petitioner also sought directions from the Court for upliftment of the existing infrastructure and facilities with regard to post-accident care and management to minimize loss of life and physical injuries to victims of road accidents.

In order to underscore the importance of Road Safety, the petitioner gave a lot of statistics relating to road accidents. In the present post, I will mention some of the facts relating to road safety that were pointed out in this case.

1. In 2010, nearly 500,000 Road Traffic Accidents took place resulting in approximately 130,000 deaths and serious injuries including amputation of limbs to over 500,000 persons.

2. On an average, 20 percent of all people killed in road accidents in developing countries are under the age of fifteen. This is twice as high as in the developed world.

3. There are as many as thirty five accidents per thousand vehicles, and the drivers involved in road crashes are in the age group 20-40 years. Two wheelers and cars contribute to 50 percent of the total accidents.

4. Road crashes cost approximately one to three percent of a country’s GDP. Other than road engineering issues, most of the accidents are caused by the drivers fault.

5. One serious road accident in the country occurs every minute; and one person dies in a road traffic accident every 4 minutes.

6. There is no standardized toll free access number to call emergency medical help in India.

7. There is a lack of awareness regarding Honourable Supreme Court of India’s directives regarding the right to emergency care for Road Traffic Accident victims and the legal protection available to good Samaritans who offer help to a victim of a road accident.

8. There is no provision to ensure adequate compensation to an RTA victim in case the accident causing vehicle does not have a third party insurance.

9. Majority of the drivers do not have a personal medi-claim policy to cater to their emergency medical needs in case of an accident.


After reading this, I am pretty sure that you would have understood the gravity of this matter. Road traffic accidents, therefore, have the potential of being one of the largest challenges to orderly human existence necessitating immediate and urgent intervention. In the next post, I will mention various directives passed by the Court in this case.

No comments:

Post a Comment