Elton Mayo |
Elton Mayo is considered to be the
initiator of the Social Psychological analysis or Human analysis in
Organizational Management. His theory is post- Follett. But, Follett’s ideas became
known much later. Mayo’s theorization is based on a number of studies he
conducted along with a number of researchers and functionaries. Mayo’s theory
is not only based on studies and experiments but at the same time, it came out
with a novel analysis which became the subject of theorization for the later
theorists such as Bernard, Simon etc.
A
Preliminary View of Mayo on the Individual and the Society
He believes that the
modern society is in a state of disorganization or anomie or planlessness. The
traditional society was based on a routine which has been broken down by
science and rationality but has not been adequately replaced with a new set of
routine. This has resulted into disorganization. The disorganization manifests
itself today in every aspect of the society (politics, culture, economy,
industry etc.).
This can be addressed
by bringing about an Adaptive Society.
It is a type of society which has the capacity to accommodate or adapt to the
newer conditions or newer situations. It is a society which emphasizes on
education and administration. The emphasis is on value based education. Value based education intends to impart
wisdom i.e. the ability to distinguish between the right and the wrong. While
referring to administration, he says that the administration is managed by the Administrative Elites. Administrative
Elites means administrators which are not only equipped with the technical
skills but also the social skills i.e. both the hard and the soft skill. Thus,
he emphasizing on a participative approach.
Hawthrone
Study
Mayo along with a team
conducted this study in the Hawthrone unit of the Western Electrical Plant in
USA.
1.
Philadelphia
Textile Mill Study or the First Enquiry- Philadelphia Textile
was a model and a successful organization. But, during the early 20th
century, a spinning unit of this mill developed certain problems such as
absenteeism, high labour turnover (250%- number of workers joining and leaving
the organization. Thus, an organization will require hiring much more persons
than it would originally require to maintain the organization in a working
condition) and thereby, inefficiency and loss persisted. The mill took the help
of a number of Engineer-Managers to address this problem. All this went in
vain. Finally, it was referred to the Harvard School of Business
Administration. In that context, it was assigned to Elton Mayo.
When
Mayo visited the unit, he found that the work condition inside the unit is very
noisy and the workers were working for very long work hours without any rest.
Mayo took a simple initiative by introducing few rest periods or rest pauses
between the work hours. Very surprisingly, the absenteeism reduced, turnover
vanished and productivity increased.
Subsequently,
after some time, the managers withdrew the Rest Periods. Previous condition of
absenteeism and loss of productivity revisited. Alarmed by the condition, the
managers introduced the rest periods with conditions and linking it with
production. Again, the absenteeism reduced but productivity did not increase to
the previous levels. So, Rest Periods were introduced without conditions which
brought the productivity to the previous level.
Mayo
said that the nature of work being monotonous, work condition being noisy and
work duration being long, the workers are suffering from fatigue and witnessing
melancholic or pessimistic reveries. The workers were not able to interact with
each other and were not able to enjoy the social or optimistic reveries. The
introduction of Rest Pauses enabled the workers to interact with each other and
able to adjust to the boredom of the work. It also relieved their fatigue.
Because of this the absenteeism stopped and the workers were able to
concentrate on work.
2.
Western Electrical Plant was a
well-developed, profit making organization. It witnessed similar problems. The
organization responded in a usual manner by employing Engineer Managers. It
failed miserably. So, the organization initiated some studies.
a. Illumination Experiment-
Under this experiment, the very aim was to understand the co-relation between
the physical condition of the work and productivity. In this experiment, the
effort was to understand the effect of lightning on the productivity.
Two teams were created and each team
comprised of six females workers. In the beginning, the level of lighting was
maintained at a constant level. The workers were allowed to work under a
particular level of lighting for a particular time so that they were able to
acclimatize themselves with that level of lighting. After a period of time, in
the context of one of the teams, the level of lighting was gradually increased.
Interestingly, as the lighting was gradually increased, the productivity also
increased simultaneously. After reaching a point, the level of light was
gradually decreased. As, the level of lighting was reduced, the productivity
increased. The productivity went on increasing till the level when the lighting
became so dim that the workers were not able to see at all.
With the other team, the level of
lighting was maintained at a constant level. Interestingly, the productivity
with the second group also increased. By this time, Mayo joined the experiment.
Mayo and his team started with a new experiment called as Assembly Relay Test
Room Experiment.
Under this study, Mayo selected six
female workers. In this study, gradually numbers of incentives were provided.
They were provided with shorter work hours, bonuses, rest periods, refreshments
etc. While, these incentives were being provided, the productivity went on
increasing. After a point of time, these incentives were gradually withdrawn.
As the incentives were being withdrawn, the productivity was increasing.
Subsequently, Mayo came out with an
explanation to explain these findings. The reason for the increase in
productivity is social and psychological. Thus, the reason is human and not
mechanical in nature. The workers are aware that they are being observed and
are part of an experimental team. This is giving them a sense of importance and recognition. Here, the supervisor is
friendly and consistently interacting with the workers. The observers were also
interacting with the workers. The changes introduced were introduced with the
knowledge of the workers. These conditions resulted into creation of a group feeling and developed a sense of participation
among the workers. This particular social interaction and feeling is
responsible for the rise in productivity.
With this, the team wanted to conduct
further studies to concretize their findings.
b. Interview Experiment-
This is also referred to as Human Relations and Sentiment Experiment. The aim
was conduct as many interviews of the workers as possible. The Hawthrone Plant
employed around 40,000 workers. Under this program, around 21,000 workers were
interviewed. Interviews were recruited for the said purpose. The interviewers
were asked to be patient and attentive towards the remarks of the workers. They
were also asked to maintain records and not interfere even though the workers
deviate from the questions and gave vague answers. Also, the views of the
workers were not shared with the management.
While the interviews were being
conducted, the productivity went on increasing. Later on, when Elton Mayo went
through the data, he found that the workers have come out with a diverse range
of views. Most of these views were negative in nature related to the management
and the working conditions. Some even mentioned the problems in their families
and neighbourhood. Mayo concluded that the increase in productivity was because
of the interview program which acted as a Ventilation Therapy for the workers
and at the same time, the workers developed a sense of “We” feeling. This was the reason for the increase in productivity.
Workers developed a feeling that their views were important for the
organization and those views will be incorporated in the work process. This
view of the workers was reinforced by a changed behaviour of the supervisor
towards them because supervisors were instructed to be friendly. This feeling
resulted into a sense of participation and the workers were psychologically attached
with the organization.
Mayo was aware of the fact that the
studies have been conducted in an artificial environment i.e. the workers were
aware that they were being observed. Mayo wanted to conduct further studies in
a natural or a spontaneous environment.
c. Bank Wiring Experiment-
This is also being referred to as Social
Organization and Disorganization Experiment. It was conducted through Participant Observation method. Under
this, the researchers became a part of the workforce. The study found out that
the supervisors have set a target but the workers were not working as per the
targets set by the supervisor. Rather, they are working and producing an amount
of work which was less than the target fixed by the supervisor. Very
interestingly, the productivity of all the workers was similar. The study found
out that the group itself has set a target which is below the supervisor’s
target. The group, in order to ensure compliance of the workers towards the
group target, introduced several social strategies such as social ostracization
or social ridiculing, name-calling etc. One who produced more than the targets
was called as Ratebuster and one who
produced less than the designated target was called as Chiseller. Also, the one who disclosed secrets to the management
was called as Squealer. Mayo
emphasized that there was an informal aspect present in every organization
apart from the formal aspect which is apparent.
Formal aspect refers to that part of the
organization which is recognized and established or the part of the
organization which is defined by the rules and manual of the organization. On
the other hand, the informal aspect of the organization refers to that part of
the organization which is not recognized by the organizational rules and
manuals. These are rules which though exist but are not recognized by the
organizational rules. Organization does not carry a single identity. It also
has an unofficial identity i.e. the informal aspect. Informal aspects can be
positive as well.
Informal aspect, if not nurtured well,
will result into negative behaviour and retard productivity. If it nurtured
well, it will enhance productivity and further the organizational goal.
Organization is a social group based on
an intricate web of Human Relations bound together by sentiments. This view is
contrary to the line of thought adopted by the classical theorists because they
considered individuals as members of the organization who were isolated beings
driven by their own self-interest. Classical theories of the organization have
developed a view of the organization which is merely an assemblage of
individuals with hedonistic interests.
This view of Mayo attracted certain
comments. Some say that Mayo has promoted a herd hypothesis (Mayo’s Theory) as
against a rabble hypothesis (Classical Theory). Group influencing the
individual- Herd, all individuals act under self-interest- Rabble. Mayo says
that individuals are influenced by non-economic incentives as well. He also
says that within the organization, there exists an informal aspect to it which
influences the productivity.
d. Much
later in 1944, after Hawthrone Studies were over, Mayo was invited to view the
California Aircraft Industry which was under similar difficulties such as
absenteeism and loss of productivity. He did not conduct any study here but
went to his institute and looked at the findings which he gathered during the
Hawthrone experiment. He applied the same findings to the California Aircraft
Industry. He observed that the organization is being managed mechanically and
not being managed by considering the human aspect within the organization. He
suggested for relaxed supervision, regular consultation with the workers and allowing
their participation in the decision-making. He focused on the human aspect of
the organization. This resulted into a group feeling or a team feeling among
the workers and the absenteeism reduced. This particular event further
corroborated the Elton’s view under the Hawthrone Studies.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete